In a time without precedent, benchmarks, or guardrails, we can claim just about anything and opposition will have to acknowledge possibility. But this is serious, and we do have precedent.

  • The outside world is a wreck, the U.S. is the world’s only locomotive, and cash is pouring in here again, forcing long-term rates down.
  • The Fed’s cost of money is still at an all-time emergency low, and the Fed owns nearly $4 trillion in Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities.
  • The Fed is trying to tighten, but mortgage rates here are now down from 4.25 percent closing on 3.5 percent in just six months.

In a time without precedent, benchmarks, or guardrails, we can claim just about anything and opposition will have to acknowledge possibility.

But this is serious, and we do have precedent. Tomorrow, the Federal Reserve will meet and decide whether to raise the overnight cost of money, which will have an effect on the economy.

Lessons from the ’90s

In 1997 a major debt and currency crisis began in Thailand with a run on the baht, and quickly became a global affair known as the “Asian Contagion.” The crisis peaked in August 1998 with the default by Russia on its debt. The Fed and Treasury feared the crisis would spin out of control, the rest of the world weakening and only the US able to pull the world out of a bad spiral.

The Fed’s cost of money (the Fed funds rate) was 5.5 percent. By the way, the stock market was booming, two years after Greenspan’s “irrational exuberance warning, but the Fed cut its rate three months in a row in fall 1998 to 4.75 percent.

In February 1999, Time magazine’s cover (remember magazines?) proclaimed the “Committee to Save the World:” Greenspan, Robert Rubin at Treasury, and Larry Summers at the White House.

History can be so inconvenient, and unkind. As it turned out, the global currency crisis sent a flood of cash to the U.S., and despite a strong economy here dropped mortgage rates to 6.75 percent by the end of 1998 from 8 percent in spring 1997.

That cash influx had even more force than the Fed’s rate cut, and the combination sent the stock market into new hysterics in 1999 — up another 2000 points to its unfortunate top one year later — also igniting inflation.

The Fed was forced to reverse field very fast, withdrawing all three 1998 cuts during 1999 and tacking on three more hikes in 2000. Recession the result.

The Fed remembers.

[graphiq id=”dySedCRxTuZ” title=”Fed Funds Rate vs. 30 Year Mortgage Rate Since 1971″ width=”600″ height=”628″ url=”https://w.graphiq.com/w/dySedCRxTuZ” link=”https://www.graphiq.com” link_text=”Visualization by Graphiq” ]

What’s the situation today?

This time the situation is different (they’re all different), but the same: the outside world is a wreck, the U.S. is the world’s only locomotive, and cash is pouring in here again and forcing long-term rates here back down, close to the 2012 all-time lows.

This time, unlike 1998, the Fed’s cost of money is still at an all-time emergency low, and the Fed owns nearly $4 trillion in Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities, bought to get our long-term rates down in the first place.

The Fed has been worried for nearly two years that it has been too easy for too long. It took its first, timid step up in December and got deeper overseas trouble as its reward, the major overseas central banks hosing cash in strengthening streams, a lot of that cash surfing right over here.

How housing matters

The Fed is trying to tighten, but mortgage rates here are now down from 4.25 percent closing on 3.5 percent in just six months — credit here easier than it was when the Fed started!

We do not have an overheated housing market, but it is recovering and its hot zones are on fire. The downward pressure on U.S. mortgages from overseas is still considerable, even after the drop so far this year — if anything, pulling down harder.

More tightening by the Fed runs the risk of making things worse overseas, but overseas events are easing for the Fed here when the Fed thinks it should be tightening. Should the Fed continue hikes to counteract unwanted foreign easing, to avoid the mistake of 1998?

[Tweet “Should the Fed continue hikes to counteract unwanted foreign easing?”]

Be glad you don’t have Chair Yellen’s job. Not this year.

Lou Barnes is a mortgage broker based in Boulder, Colorado. He can be reached at lbarnes@pmglending.com.

Show Comments Hide Comments
Sign up for Inman’s Morning Headlines
What you need to know to start your day with all the latest industry developments
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive marketing emails from Inman.
Success!
Thank you for subscribing to Morning Headlines.
Back to top
×
Log in
If you created your account with Google or Facebook
Don't have an account?
Forgot your password?
No Problem

Simply enter the email address you used to create your account and click "Reset Password". You will receive additional instructions via email.

Forgot your username? If so please contact customer support at (510) 658-9252

Password Reset Confirmation

Password Reset Instructions have been sent to

Subscribe to The Weekender
Get the week's leading headlines delivered straight to your inbox.
Top headlines from around the real estate industry. Breaking news as it happens.
15 stories covering tech, special reports, video and opinion.
Unique features from hacker profiles to portal watch and video interviews.
Unique features from hacker profiles to portal watch and video interviews.
It looks like you’re already a Select Member!
To subscribe to exclusive newsletters, visit your email preferences in the account settings.
Up-to-the-minute news and interviews in your inbox, ticket discounts for Inman events and more
1-Step CheckoutPay with a credit card
By continuing, you agree to Inman’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

You will be charged . Your subscription will automatically renew for on . For more details on our payment terms and how to cancel, click here.

Interested in a group subscription?
Finish setting up your subscription
×