• Pinpointing areas where prices are high and examining the reasons can help economists ascertain whether a "housing bubble" is present or not.

In 2011, house prices started recovering from the Great Recession.

For the first few years, rapid house price appreciation was welcome news. Homeowners regained lost equity, the number of underwater borrowers shrank and delinquencies and defaults fell.

More recently, though, surging house prices have led some to worry about the potential for another house price bubble. Recently, house prices finally topped their 2006 peaks, and growth has been particularly strong in recent years, averaging 5.6 percent annually.

How can we tell when we should be worried about rising house prices?

There is no foolproof technique, but there are methods that provide useful guidance.

We employ a two-stage method approach. The first stage compares the prices of recent sales to household incomes to pinpoint areas that merit further scrutiny.

The second stage checks whether additional indicators suggest that house prices in the highlighted areas are headed for a fall in the future. So far, these indicators suggest that it’s not time to worry about house prices — yet.

First stage: Pinpointing high house prices

We’re looking for a way to spot areas where house price increases appear to be feeding on themselves for no apparent economic reason — in other words, the beginning of a bubble.

To thin the herd of over 350 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) nationwide, we look at price-to-income (PTI) ratios. These ratios vary a lot across the country, so assessments have to be made relative to what is typical for each MSA.

For example, San Francisco is a desirable location, and residents historically have been willing to devote a larger-than-average share of their budgets to live there. In addition, buildable land in San Francisco is extremely limited, so the supply of housing can’t expand to meet the high demand. As a result, the PTI ratio in San Francisco usually is much higher than it is elsewhere.

201605-insight-exhibit-03_a

Ten metros with unusually-high PTI ratios as of the end of 2015 appear on our watch list. The ratios in these 10 metros are high relative to the historical experience in each metro.

Interestingly, they appear in clusters — Raleigh and Charlotte in North Carolina; Jacksonville, Orlando, and Miami in Florida; Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio in Texas; and Portland and San Jose on the West Coast.

Second stage: Are house prices headed for a fall in these areas?

The PTI ratio doesn’t, by itself, identify potential house price bubbles. Other supporting information is needed. In particular, we examine the answers to three questions:

  • Are there nonfinancial reasons for the high PTI ratios?
  • Are credit conditions deteriorating?
  • Is leverage increasing?

Are there nonfinancial reasons for the high PTI ratios?

A key characteristic of housing markets currently is the limited supply of houses for sale. Nine of the 10 metros on our watch list have less than six months of inventory today.

Three metros have between three and four months of inventory; four have between two and three months; and Portland has just over one month of inventory. Only Miami appears to have a balance between supply and demand.

The increase in recent years in income inequality provides another reason increasing PTI ratios may not be signaling increasing house price risk. PTI ratios compare the median price of recently-sold homes to the median household income, including households that intend to remain renters and homeowners with no plans to move.

[Tweet “How can we tell when we should be worried about rising house prices?”]

The upward trend of traditional PTI ratios may indicate simply that more-affluent households are purchasing higher-end houses. Affordability may be decreasing for average- and lower-income households, but the households that are purchasing homes may not be stretching financially to do so.

Read the full story in the Attom Data Solutions Housing News Report.

Sean Becketti, Ph.D., is vice president and chief economist at Freddie Mac.

Show Comments Hide Comments
Sign up for Inman’s Morning Headlines
What you need to know to start your day with all the latest industry developments
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive marketing emails from Inman.
Success!
Thank you for subscribing to Morning Headlines.
Back to top
×
Log in
If you created your account with Google or Facebook
Don't have an account?
Forgot your password?
No Problem

Simply enter the email address you used to create your account and click "Reset Password". You will receive additional instructions via email.

Forgot your username? If so please contact customer support at (510) 658-9252

Password Reset Confirmation

Password Reset Instructions have been sent to

Subscribe to The Weekender
Get the week's leading headlines delivered straight to your inbox.
Top headlines from around the real estate industry. Breaking news as it happens.
15 stories covering tech, special reports, video and opinion.
Unique features from hacker profiles to portal watch and video interviews.
Unique features from hacker profiles to portal watch and video interviews.
It looks like you’re already a Select Member!
To subscribe to exclusive newsletters, visit your email preferences in the account settings.
Up-to-the-minute news and interviews in your inbox, ticket discounts for Inman events and more
1-Step CheckoutPay with a credit card
By continuing, you agree to Inman’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

You will be charged . Your subscription will automatically renew for on . For more details on our payment terms and how to cancel, click here.

Interested in a group subscription?
Finish setting up your subscription
×